Forest Management Strategies for Carbon Storage

 

Mark E. Harmon, Richardson Chair Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

 

 

Forests may have an important role to play in removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  The exact role they play is dependent not only on the area available for management but also the management system that is applied and whether it is based on sound scientific principles including those of basic ecosystem science.  Assessing forest management strategies involves field studies of processes and changes in stores over succession, modeling of alternative systems, and consideration of questions of scale in the application of these results.  The influence of live tree and coarse woody debris (CWD) on NEP (Net Ecosystem Production) over secondary succession has been conducted using data collected along a 500-year chronosequence on the Wind River Ranger District, Washington.  Simple statistical models of live and dead wood accumulation and decomposition predicted the transition from negative to positive NEP occurred between 0 and 57 years after disturbance depending upon the amount of wood left after disturbance.  These data indicate that at a rotation age of 80 years, regenerating stands stored approximately half the wood C as remaining nearby old-growth forests (age ~500 years), indicating conversion of the latter forests to younger managed forests results in a significant net release of C to the atmosphere.  .Simulation models including the key ecosystem processes of growth, mortality, and decomposition have indicated that agricultural fields stored the least (15% of the maximum) and forests protected from fire stored the greatest amount (93% of the maximum) of landscape level C.  Conversion of old-growth forests in Oregon and Washington to any other management or disturbance regime resulted in a net loss of C, whereas conversion of agricultural systems to forest systems had the opposite effect.  The three factors, in order of increasing importance, most crucial in developing an optimum C storage system were: 1) rotation length, 2) amount of live mass harvested, and 3) amount of detritus removed by slashburning.  C stores increased as rotation length increased, but decreased as fraction of trees harvested and detritus removed increased.  Simulations indicate partial harvest and minimal fire use may provide as many forest products as the traditional clear cut/broadcast burn system while increasing C stores.  An adequate supply of wood products may not therefore be incompatible with a system that increases C stores.  Application of these results when assessing management systems requires consideration to scaling.  By paying closer attention to scale, seemly contradictory results concerning forest management and carbon sequestration can be resolved.  This in turn can lead to the development of a viable carbon sequestration policy.