|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Landscape Dynamic Simulation Models (LDSM)—utility as communication tool
- The Swan Valley, Western Montana
- Existing partnerships in the Swan Valley
- Landscape Assessment for the Swan Valley
- Testing a LDSM on non-agency participants
|
|
3
|
- LDSM’s are recommended as important to resource planning efforts
- A tool for land managers (Forest Service and BLM)
- Integrate knowledge of vegetation change resulting from disturbance
processes and management actions
|
|
4
|
- Interaction between disturbance processes
- Interaction between processes and vegetation patterns
- Interaction of landscape components: vegetation, landforms, aquatics
- integration of knowledge from fine scale models and expert opinion
|
|
5
|
- Consider disturbance processes as stochastic events
- Spatial effects of treatments on disturbance processes
- Quantify ranges of vegetation conditions and disturbances
- Identify desired future conditions on changing ecosystems
|
|
6
|
- TO HELP DESIGN AND EVALUATE
- MANAGEMENT ACTIONS IN A COLLABORATIVE
- FASHION WITH AN UNDERSTANDING
- OF LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS
|
|
7
|
- BLM Dillon Field Office, RMP-2003
- Multi-disciplinary team
- Better able to see implications of alternatives at landscape scale
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- 25% of permanent residents hold >1 job
- ~1/2 of permanent residents are self-employed
- 30% of the valley’s total population is retired
|
|
12
|
- Corporate and administrative management
- Concerns for continued livelihood from local population dependent on
natural resources
- Concerns for protection of large wilderness complexes
|
|
13
|
- To address and help remedy the economic, environmental, and cultural
problems related to the decline in the Valley’s natural resource base
- Build community dialogue on specific natural resource issues including:
- Road building
- Timber harvest
- Ecologically sound resource management
|
|
14
|
- Established as a nonprofit by an ad hoc subcommittee
- Prevented closure of the Swan’s remaining Forest Service facility (the
Condon Work Center)
- Serves to represent the community in partnership with the Forest Service
|
|
15
|
- Forest stewardship timber management and logging
- Fire ecology
- Returning low intensity fire to site
- Long term site monitoring
- Vegetation, animal, and bird populations
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Baseline of current conditions
- Document for forest plan revision
- Foster community interest in a healthy ecosystem
- Encourage resolution of issues among landowners
- Develop common vision of conditions
- Build trust through collaboration
|
|
19
|
- Communication between expert and non-expert groups
- Community collaboration
- How adults learn
- Hands-on learning
|
|
20
|
- Test model utility as an aid for communicating landscape level
management goals
- Test model utility as an aid to reaching agreement on management goals
- Help Swan participants develop ecosystem management approach to managing
community forest and other private lands
|
|
21
|
- Initial interviews to measure general understanding of ecological change
on the Swan landscape
- Conduct modeling workshop with hands-on exercises
- Follow-up interviews to measure changes in understanding of ecological
change
|
|
22
|
- Participants develop management alternatives using the model
- Participants will run simulations and output will be displayed and
discussed in a workshop
- Final interview conducted
|
|
23
|
- An approach to using a LDSM as a tool for science communication,
- An approach to using a LDSM in collaborative efforts,
- An ecosystem management plan for the Swan community forest
|
|
24
|
- Data collection: vegetation map from satellite imagery, Forest Service
- Ground-truthing
- Participant selection by the Swan Ecosystem Center
|
|
25
|
- Kari Gunderson, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute
- Jimmie Chew, Rocky Mountain Research Station
- Barry Bollenbacher and Rich Lasko, USDA Forest Service, R1
- Gary Dahlgren, Flathead National Forest
- Anne Dahl, Swan Ecosystem Center
|
|
26
|
|